Skip to content

INDBInternet News Database 2.5 Updated 1 min ago · 414 sources Show or hide images Light or dark

Hilarious: NYTimes Tries to Explain to Readers Why They Committed Journalism on Decoy Dan Scandal

1 source1 article First seen 4 hours ago Updated 4 hours ago United States Truth score 34

Save Compare coverage

Image from RedState

Summary

A summary is written once at least 3 outlets cover the story.

Who is covering this

RedState Right Factuality: Mixed US 4 hours ago
Hilarious: NYTimes Tries to Explain to Readers Why They Committed Journalism on Decoy Dan Scandal
Elevated risk

Truth score

34/100Weakly supported

Independent outlets: 1
Source reliability: 55/100
Sides of the spectrum covering it: 1/3
Propaganda risk: 0/100

Elevated risk: 1

How well the story is corroborated by independent, reliable outlets across the spectrum. Not a fact-check of each claim. How the truth score works

Coverage by lean

Right 100%100%

Left: 0
Centre: 0
Right: 1
Not rated: 0

How lean is counted

Source quality

Average reliability: 55/100 (Mixed)
Low-credibility outlets: 0%
State media: 0%
Opinion pieces: 0%

Where ratings come from

Where the coverage comes from

United States1